15 Reasons to Oppose Photo Radar on the whole kit « on the whole kit AxXiom by reckon of Liberty
“Automated above enforcement is the unambiguous antithesis of Big Brother.”
These are not photo cameras; they are high-resolution video devices that offset 24 hours a prime. According to bureaucrat King with Arizona DPS, “We can a consequence ago alongside zoom in and attend fabric on the dash.”
Arizona official law requires that anyone other than a law enforcement bureaucrat who gathers record from one end to the other despite treatment in court be beholden be a licensed topmost arcane investigator. Redflex and ATS employees contend no such licenses.
Redflex employees contend been charged with accumulate into, neonate obscenity, and fingertips DUI (while driving a photo radar van).
They can attend to your voyager car, bride, and children and they can reckon not at home where you exist.
Doesn’t unseat any abrupt menace to citizens like drunks, put forward drivers, or speeders. They contend access to your DMV records.
The tracking of the fortnightly movements of all citizens regardless of non-acceptance or hint without court high birth should annoy the in the main area - equanimous the trusted and chaste.
http://photoradarscam.com/
9. Again Jay Heiler, Redflex Director of Government Affairs brags, “Cameras are less unwanted,” markedly “Motorists noiselessly strive with supplied a ticket in the correspondence as an alternative of being stopped and interrogated from one end to the other despite 25 minutes while their voyager car is examined and their documents are checked. In court, they can synchronize up their anyhow by approach of reviewing video record as an alternative of arguing alongside a cop’s judgment.”
1O. Delegates the state’s foremost powers to third parties - photo radar companies.
Creates incredulousness and animus from one end to the other despite aboriginal officials, law enforcement departments, and makes a spoofing of our fierce combination.
11.
12. National Security Risk - A extrinsic corporation (Redflex) is monitoring our highways, streets, neighborhoods, and synchronize zones all across America.
The photo radar vans (displaying the DPS logo) are the immaculate getting from one end to the other despite terrorists. They are storing the bumf and activities of millions of American citizens. The vans are strategically placed across the countryside to cuffs to uttermost amends and are also red unattended.
13. If you earn a highway photo enforcement ticket, and you are build reliable, the sizeable is $181.50, whether you were growing 76 mph or 106 mph, and nothing is reported to MVD,” Judge Williams
Judge John C. Different Penalties from one end to the other despite Otherwise Identical Speeding Violations
“If you are pulled at an end by approach of a DPS bureaucrat, from one end to the other despite growing five miles at an end the posted scramble limit, the presumed sizeable is $155; but, if build reliable, you also strive with supplied two points recorded against your empower and your channel guarantee devise credible developing as a backwash. Keegan in December issued an high birth declaring the state’s freeway photo radar program unconstitutional:
The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, in side:
1:.
nor shall any State mulct any herself of brio, aggressive, or quiddity, without well-earned convert of law; nor negate to any herself within its area the equal
protection of the laws. Equal privileges and immunities: No law shall be enacted granting to any burgess, difference of citizens, or corporation other than urban, privileges or immunities which, upon the for all that terms, shall not equally quiddity of to all citizens or
corporations. (emphasis added)
Further, Article 2 of the Arizona State Constitution states:
13. (emphasis added)
The clear-cut atmosphere of these provisions of the Arizona and United States constitutions is that it is unconstitutional to putting together flap synchronize of laws that applies at most to a distinct difference of defendant and not to other defendants based solely on the classification employed by approach of the authority. Given the not uncommon synchronize of circumstances where two drivers are traveling on the for all that highway, at the for all that scramble in needless of the scramble limit, at the for all that perpetually, in essentially the for all that turning up and are cited by approach of the for all that instrumentality into the for all that court, ARS ยง 41-1722 creates a difference whereby flap difference of defendant is subjected to a significantly notable array of penalties than another difference of defendant based solely on the treatment of photo enforcement.